web analytics

Last Friday afternoon, I was typing an e-mail shortly after learning that Terri Schiavo’s feeding tube had been removed. As I typed the words “I can’t imagine what Bob and Mary Schindler are going through right now,” my eyes focused on her mother’s name: Mary.

It occurred to me that Palm Sunday was just 2 days away. Palm Sunday, sometimes observed in my church as Palm/Passion Sunday because the entire Passion story is read aloud during worship, marks the beginning of Holy Week.

And it was then that I recognized the irony: In 2005, another woman named Mary is spending Holy Week watching her beloved child die.

I was glued to the tv on Sunday night as the House of Representatives debated and then passed legislation designed to give Terri one more chance at life.

But I awoke Monday morning to be dismayed by U.S. District Judge James Whittemore’s failure to schedule the hearing first thing that day. When I learned that he had set the hearing to begin at 3:00 p.m., I knew that Terri had moved closer to death.

And, of course, hopes were again dashed this morning when I awoke at 4:00 a.m. to learn that Judge Whittemore had denied relief to her parents, Bob and Mary. I watched Mary pleading for her daughter’s life this afternoon, begging someone — anyone — to help prevent her daughter from dying of thirst.

And I was reminded of another mother named Mary who, as she watched her child dying, heard him say, “I thirst.”

The case of Terri Schiavo, like the case of Robert Wendland, is a morality battle. It is about good vs. evil, right vs. wrong, moral vs. immoral. I will demonstrate that beyond a shadow of a doubt through this blog.

If Terri Schiavo dies this week from dehyration and starvation over the objections of her parents, brother, and sister, will she die a martyr’s death? Will she become, in the weeks, months, and years that follow, a symbol of how this country lost its way? How we as a nation managed to, as my friend Wesley J. Smith says, “lost our moral compass?”

Is that Terri’s destiny?

God forbid.

Author

JHSiess successfully represented the late Florence Wendland and Rebekah Vinson in the landmark California case, Conservatorship of Wendland. Her writings here are dedicated to revealing her unique perspective. Siess is quick to point out that she felt from the case's inception that she was called to handle it as a matter and test of her commitment to the law and specific principles of social justice. Accordingly, she makes no pretense about being objective here and stresses that objectivity is not the goal. Rather, it is her hope that all who read about the protracted litigation that ended with a victory in the California Supreme Court for her clients, but Robert Wendland's death before the win was assured, will resolve never to let their family members speculate about their desires in the event of catastrophic illness or injury -- and not only talk in detail with their loved ones about their wishes, but also commit them to writing. Siess says she is confident you will, after learning what Robert Wendland's family members, caregivers and friends, in addition to the attorneys, judges and justices involved in this case endured, resolve never to permit your loved ones to become embroiled in such a battle. Questions may be addressed to jhsiess@comcast.net.

Comments are closed.